Thursday, 29 August 2013

Hoagland in fantasia again...

Dear Richard,

Do you recognise this statement...

"OK, now comes the part where the "mathematically challenged" (or squeamish ...) might want to turn away. If you do, we promise we'll summarize the cool stuff -- in neat, plain English -- at the end ...."

You should because you wrote it on your website as part of "Von Braun's secret."

You then go on to completely bollocks up the mathematics. Yes, the same mathematics you are warning people to turn away from. No bloody wonder you are asking them to turn away.

Wouldn't it be more efficient to simply delete the entire mathematical mess you made. It's too late to save face of course since it has been disseminated far and wide. But for goodness sake man, have you no shame whatsoever.

Kindest Regards

None .... :)

Certainly, NOT from you.


Hi Richard,

Not much more to say on Von Braun's secret. Since you admit to having no shame.

Implicit in that statement is that you have no respect for your audience, since the whole sorry mangled mess of mathematics and abject lunacy is still on The Enterprise Mission webpage for all to see.

You often say science is nothing if it's not prediction. How's this for some science.

I predict Richard Hoagland will never admit to being wrong about anything. I also predict that he will steadfastly refuse to take down what he calls, 'a paper' regarding the over-performance of Explorer1. Even though it has been proven on many occasions to be utterly wrong because Hoagland is a mathematical dunce."

No baselines, no controls, no data, no calibration, nothing. Please stop stealing from people with your lies. Please return the funds you fleeced from your congregation to go to Egypt with your laptop, accutron and microset toys. You didn't go because you didn't get enough funding, but kept the dosh anyway. What an utter bandit.

Kindest Regards

No, Derek, I have no respect for YOU--

Since you attempted to have your girlfriend "seduce" me with the promise of "LOTS of money ..." -- if I would "just turn over to YOU all my unpublished work on the Accutron torsion field measurements ...."

Before publication.

Nice ethics, Derek.

So, the more you rant and rave, the more I am amused by your truly pathetic OBSESSION with our work.

And, if it is SO wrong ... why do you even "care?" :)


P.S. EVERY scientist or engineer at one time or another, has made mathematical errors -- even YOU. :)

Here is one of the more famous ... by the guy who "invented" the Big Bang Model, no less ....

Hi Richard,

Thank you for the reply. Although as expected you answer nothing.
Yes you were offered cash, safe in the knowledge you had bugger all data to publish since you make it up as you go along. This has been undeniably established by myself and others. You know this, yet still you have such utter nonsense as Von Braun's secret on your website.

You use no baselines, no control and no calibration. Your "science" is worthless junk. Where is this data you intended to blow our minds with. You said over a year ago you were working night and day to get this information out. Yet nothing from you. Could this be because myself and others have shamed you into silence. I'd like to think so.

Hilarious to hear you talking of ethics Richard. You fleeced money from people to go to Egypt, didn't go and then pocketed the cash. Nice ethics Richard.

You ask if your work is so wrong why do I even care ?
I care because you insist you are a scientist dong scientific work. When in fact you are nothing more than a cheap swindler making unfalsifiable claims and dressing them up as real science. Remember Hale Bopp ? - I hope you do since you were instrumental in convincing people it was something other than a comet. We all know what happened at Heavens gate. You must bear some of the responsibility of that human tragedy. It's disgusting.

Not content with Hale Bopp, we then get Phobos, YU55, Elenin, and quite possibly Ison (I predict you will be calling that a spaceship too).

Obama as a member of the Shem Su Hor, Elenin is a spaceship, miles high glass skyscrapers on the Moon, utter garbage dressed up as HD physics. Are you seeing a pattern here Richard ? - A pattern of one monumental cluster frag after another. You are no better than Sean David Morton, another well known liar and thief.

Kindest Regards

Thursday, 22 August 2013

Hoagland replies.....


Now, now ... temper ... temper ....             :)

And please ... DO post this as far and wide as possible -- gratuitous obscenities included (of course)!
It will ONLY drive more folks to read what you (literally) are "raving about" ... and, to find out what we ACTUALLY have said (and written) ....

And, thanks to YOU, to finally "open their eyes."

Hi Richard,

Obscenities are a favourite of your former co-author. I have the screenshots to prove it. Mikey boy likes to call female critics "cunts."
Both you and I know this is unacceptable as a man. We may have our differences Richard, but you will agree that speaking to a lassie in such terms is not the actions of a man. Bara would do well to stick with the rudimentary grunts and gestures he was obviously taught as a fledgling.

Moving on. Please respond to specifics. For example Von Braun's secret. You can't, can you. Because you have been proved wrong. Big time.
Yes the teenagers have been unleashed. Bad for you mate,  good for the sheeple rednecks you plan to fleece.

Please delete the thoroughly discredited Von Braun's secret. It makes a respected scientist like yourself look like a tit.

Oh and can you please state what units torsion waves are measured in. And hows about some data for we real engineers to discredit.

You know, baselines and stuff like that. Bring it on man, you v me on C2C. You can make it happen. But Noory must not be allowed to moderate since he is under your spell, and is therefore biased as well as a dunce.

Kindest Regards

Wednesday, 21 August 2013

Abject Spunk Trumpetry yet again by Hoagland and Bara

Dear Richard and Mike,
This is an open letter which will be plastered all over every piece of social media myself my colleagues, and our children can find. Isn't it truly amazing how many people you can reach on social media when you get teenagers and young adults involved. Don't you find it astonishing how our children have taken to such things.
Now on to the truth. I realize that this is something that both of you are unfamiliar with. Nevertheless, shall we press on regardless.
To document the bare faced lies you two bandits have been perpetrating over the years would require a ridiculous amount of time. However, since I actually have a real job as a real engineer I will have to cherry pick. And oh my, how big the cherry tree is.
Hoagland's preposterous lies about Von Braun and Explorer1 have been exposed because he couldn't even fill in the numbers and crank the handle on one of the most well known (and simple) rocket equations. I refer of course to the equation derived by K.Tsiolkovsky. Yet this utter garbage is still on his utterly shambolic 1990's style webpage after all these years. Even after multiple instances of Hoagland's atrocious mathematical skills being pointed out. The man has no shame. You couldn't even paint a red neck on this clown. His hubris knows no bounds.
The torsion waves Hoagland pretends to measure with a 40 year old wristwatch and a laptop computer don't exist. Even if they did exist Hoagland has done nothing to prove it. In fact his method is so far short of the scientific method that it is simply laughable. No baselines, no controls, no calibration and no fucking data. Hoagland even refuses to share his data with what he calls "complete strangers." This is what we real engineers and scientists do all the time you dimwit. It is called peer review.
Hoagland told us that comet Elenin was a spacecraft with a hyperdimensional shield generator on board. He attempted to prove this by faking yet another image. First by legitimately stacking frames and then using photoshop to manipulate the final image. True to form Hoagland refuses to tell anyone what frames and in what order he used them.

 He also told us that Elenin had a message for humanity sent from 13,000 years ago by our highly advanced ancestors the Shem Su Hor (the followers of Horus) who apparently had something important to tell us. I must have missed it. Although Hoagland tried to tell the world that the Arab spring was due to Elenin's influence.Yes he really did say all that stuff, and he calls himself a scientist. Stop laughing, he really did say that.

 Comet Elenin disintegrated, everyone with an interest in comets saw it. Hoagland lied about this too, and tried to show an earlier picture as "proof" that Elenin was still intact. He milked that one big time, before being caught rotten on Facebook by many critics. He was caught so rotten that he had to abandon his facebook account (although it still exists he hasn't posted there in well over a year) as he was being made a laughing stock. Not that he already wasn't.
The whole disgrace is catalogued in a wiki page dedicated to Hoagland's spunk-trumpetry.

Hoagland insists that the wiki page is invalid because NASA edits it and are out to get him. Yes he really did say that too. Fucking clownhat.
Mikey boy Bara is simply a thoroughly disagreeable little man. He has no flair for mathematics, lies uncontrollably, and likes to refer to his critics as homosexuals or douchebags. Unless you are female in which case he will ask you not to reproduce because you are too ugly.

Tuesday, 13 August 2013

Hoagland replies, and says nothing.

9:28 PM (14 hours ago)

to me
Did YOU know that Wiki is edited by NASA (Google)?                  :)

As my grandmother used to say--

"Consider the source."       

Hi Richard,
It's very telling that you only choose to respond to emails where you have some wiggle room or you can throw forth one of your famous unfalsifiable claims. You refuse for example, when pressed, to state what units torsion fields are measured in. You refuse to admit that your Explorer 1 explanation is poppycock due to your inability to apply a simple equation correctly. But you will boldly state stuff that cannot be verified.

You could have written that Wiki (or indeed Rational Wiki, as you claimed in your reply) was edited by two of the surviving Von Trapp children supervised by Julie Andrews. It sounds as ridiculous as NASA editing pages dedicated to exposing pseudoscientists, but I cannot state that it is not true. No matter how preposterous the notion.
You told us that water is a very effective shield with respect to torsion waves, yet still wanted funding to visit the Baltic Sea object. Don't you remember being caught with that one ?
Not ONCE have you addressed your mathematical errors, and in fact they remain on your page after all these years. Perhaps you are lazy, or maybe you just don't give a monkey's curse about either your audience or your critics.
Not once have you provided baselines or controls when conducting experiments. You have never shown your data. In fact you stated that, "you would not hand over your data to complete strangers." This is what we engineers and scientists do on a regular basis Richard. It's called peer review.

Expat caught you faking data. You were nicked 100% with no get out of jail free card. You said there is a mile square ziggurat on the Moon, knowing the source of the data was from a teenage gamers forum, and quite probably knowing that the image was a fake, and not a very good one at that. Not a word though from you or Mike now that kksamurai has shown up with the original that he faked all those years ago.
As my Grandfather used to say, "If you can never admit to making a mistake, you can never be a real man."
Kindest Regards

Monday, 12 August 2013

Hoagland and Bara get Rational Wikified

Hi Richard,
Have you seen THIS on rational wiki ?
Mike even has his own page too. There are more facts on those pages than either you or Mike have had printed in books. I think the mathematics speak for themselves, however if you need a helping hand to understand what is being said mathematically I'd be more than happy to oblige.
I can't help Mike though, he understands even less mathematics than you do. He even wrote that light can penetrate our deepest oceans before being reflected from the ocean floor and back into space. Yes, I'm serious he REALLY said that. And in print too. As they say on the internetz LOL.

Kindest Regards

Friday, 9 August 2013

Attack of the lying twats

On the video bar on the right of this page you will find a couple of videos that show just what mendacity we are dealing with. By "we" I mean myself and others who take an interest in seeing snake oil salesmen like Richard C. Hoagland and Mike Bara exposed for what they really are. Dishonest liars who earn a living by fleecing the gullible. Below is a list of their idiocy.

  • Elenin was not a comet. It was a hyperdimensionally shielded spacecraft with a message for humanity. Sent by our ancestors 13,000 years ago. These ancestors being "The Shem Su-Hor" - the followers of Horus, an ancient Egyptian deity.
  • Asteroid YU55 is also an artificial craft.
  •  Mars' moon Phobos is a derelict and incredibly ancient spacecraft
  •   Light can travel all the way to the bottom of our deepest oceans.
  • Centrifugal force makes you heavier.
  •  President Obama is a member of the Shem Su-Hor.
  • Mars has a highly eccentric orbit.
  • NASA murdered the crew of Apollo 1.
  • There are ancient ruins all over Mars. Including a Nike trainer.
  • We went to the Moon to retrieve ancient alien technology.

I kid you not. I'll leave it up to you to guess who said what.


Mike Bara's internet wife.

Yes indeed, as sad as it sounds it would appear that Mike Bara author of comedy titles such as "The Choice", and "Ancient Aliens on the Moon" has found himself a Facebook wife. Her name is Sara Shanae, and, like Mike, appears to have the same unbridled contempt for anyone who does not lap at the leathery bottom of her internet Hubby. Below is a post Sara made on The Emoluments of Mars.

SaraShanae said...
Expat - Mike is very gracious when it comes to talking with fans, and he'll answer just about anything you want if you do him a favor or two, especially if it involves fellatio. So maybe you should get down on your knees and ask him yourself? ;)

I'm not your messenger girl. I'm not surprised that you'd ask me to ask him for you though. I can understand that you're too intimidated to actually do your own work. I can tell by your website, sorry "free blow", as well, that you have no idea how to form even a single ORIGINAL thought of your own. If Mike Bara wasn't around and doing what he is doing, you wouldn't have shit to stand on.

Here's a thought: Since you're so incredibly knowledgeable in all of these areas, why don't you write your own book and get published? But you and I both know why you haven't and wont do that. You don't know how to create anything. All you know is how to mooch off of other people's work.

Better put on those knee pads, chump. Looks like it's going to be your only option for success. Mike's jizz comes with a LOAD of knowledge. Sucking one off might do you more good than stalking him online ever could, anyways. ;)

Tuesday, 6 August 2013

An open letter to Coast to Coast AM regarding the mendacious behaviour of Hoagland

An open letter to Coast to Coast AM

Greetings people of  C2C,
I am writing this in the hope that at least one of you will take the time to listen to THIS PODCAST. It explains in quite some detail just exactly why your "science adviser" Richard C. Hoagland is disgracing your show by promoting what he calls real science, when in actual fact he is peddling complete and utter, demonstrably false rubbish.
I refer of course to his "accutron torsion sensing equipment." You know the 40 year old watch hooked up via a microset measuring device to a laptop. Richard may well call me a NASA shill, or a disinfo agent to cover his tracks. But in reality I am neither. I am simply a disgruntled listener who also happens to be an electronics engineer of some 25 years experience and am sick to the back teeth of Hoagland's utter contempt for your audience and total disregard for rigorous scientific method.
I urge you to actually listen to the podcast on designing a proper experiment. It surely will convince you that Hoagland's silly experiments are utterly worthless. Not only that, but will convince you that Hoagland has demonstrably faked his data.
Does C2C really care about it's audience. If it did then Hoagland would be made accountable for his mendacity. On air.

Kindest Regards
Derek James Eunson

Intellectual Bad Ass my arse.

This sent to the intellectual fruitfly that calls itself Mike Bara.


Here is a post taken directly from the most excellent blog entitled The Emoluments of Mars, or more commonly "Dorkmission."

Hoagland and Bara a liars and thieves. I still have my original images but don't have time for their BS. I am kksamurai aka terry james aka rah

Will you now admit you simply went with an obvious fake because Hoagland told you it was real. Man you got chumped big time by your mate. Hilarious. Intellectual bad ass in Ferrari sunglasses my bahookey. Intellectual midget in "made in Hong Kong cheapness" more like.
Kindest Regards

Hoagland and Bara humiliated yet again.

Hi Richard,
This is an open letter.

I thought you may be interested to hear the latest podcast regarding your accutron torsion sensor. It may be found HERE.
I know that you will understand what Dr Robbins is talking about. Although  I'm afraid that Dr Robbins completely invalidates EVERYTHING you have ever done with your microset/accutron setup. Anyone with even a rudimentary grasp of the scientific method will understand that.
It will be an embarrassing listen, but I urge you to struggle through.

This is why yourself and Mike Bara refuse to debate real engineers or scientists. Well, I guess this is why you won't debate. As for Mike, he won't debate because he is in an ever decreasing circle, regurgitating old claptrap that he has either stolen or plagiarised.
I wonder why Noory never did get round to inviting Dr Robbins on C2C despite initially thinking it was a good idea. Although Mike, in his wisdom said to Noory at the time, "if he's on I won't listen." What he meant was, "I won't listen because I'd be publicly humiliated (again) due to the fact that Dr Robbins actually understands science, whereas I simply make stuff up, and when called out on it I respond by screaming NASA shill, homo, and ugly cunt at them."
Bara truly is a repugnant little man. You are better than that Richard, why not take up the challenge and respond to Dr Robbins refuting his claims.
Oh and isn't it great that Terry James aka KKsamurai has shown up. You know..., the guy who faked the ziggurat. He admitted he created it, still has the original, and has called out you and Mike as thieves and liars. Mike even dedicated almost an entire chapter to this fake. After you told him it was real. That was a master stroke Richard. Make Bara look like an arse for nicking all your work and publishing it for himself, by telling him what was clearly a fake was real. Pure class.

Kindest Regards