Wednesday, 30 December 2015

Richard C. Hoagland and his fawning lickspittles.

Readers of this blog and others. Aimed at correcting the heinous crimes committed against science by Richard C. Hoagland and his gang of fake scientists will no doubt be aware just how indoctrinated the members of "Branch Hoaglandia" are.

Recently I have engaged in another attempt at educating these poor lost souls via a closed facebook group which is called "Richard C Hoagland." Astonishingly I have not been banned yet. As is wont to happen with these type of groups when any dissent from their blinkered views is put forth. I found it quite appalling just how ignorant of real science these people are. They absolutely suck up everything the Hoaxmeister says as gospel, and will simply refuse to read any explanation proving their Lord and Master wrong.

What a waste of fucking time. Or is it? Perhaps there are people who read but don't post. Perhaps these same people did actually take the time to read the links I provided exposing Hoagland's utter mendacity and disgraceful attempts at mathematics.

I found I had three main adversaries. First off, in chirped Hoagland's main bum chum Keith "good ole boy" Laney. Then came the other two. Let us just refer to them as Alan Fanboi, and Tony the Bigot.
Good ole boy of course still thinks the face on Mars is real. As do Fanboi and Bigot. In fact, Fanboi actually posted the 1976 image as proof. Refusing to believe (or more likely do the hard yards and fucking learn it for himself) all attempts at trying to explain what pixel size and resolution meant. Fanboi was backed up by Tony the Bigot early on. I had someone's attention for sure. Then the insults started.

Insulting any and all dissenters is standard practice for the Branch Hoaglandians. I am used to it. This was just more of the same. Originality has never occurred to people whose 1-inch thoughts dominate their paradigm. Fanboi tried to trick me into thinking he was actually reading my destruction of Hoagland's science. Trying to sound windswept, cryptic and interesting by posting two or three-word replies. I wasn't impressed. Fanboi is a believer. He cannot be saved. I did try. He simply refused to look at the evidence and shoved his fingers in his ears shouting LALALALA...NO YOU!!!!

Next up was Tony the Bigot. He was a little more verbose than Fanboi but no less ignorant. Even in the face (pun intended) of overwhelming evidence, Tony simply refused to contemplate Hoagland could possibly be wrong. Branch Hoaglandia indeed appears to have a "Scientology type" grip over it's disciples. Rather alarming don't you think. I was then labeled a paid shill. Fuck me, I've never heard that one before. NOT!

Lady Woo then posts about the Chinese lander. She is curious about the "numbers" associated with the landing site. I corrected her, stating that Hoaxmeister himself had stated 19.5 degrees North or South are important to his theory. I told her 19.5 degrees West does not count. Then it occurred to me just why she would make that association. Hoagland himself actually mentioned the 19.44 degrees West and said that the Chinese were sending messages to the elites about HD physics. More moving the goalposts by Hoagland. In chimes Alan Fanboi, posting old and discredited rubbish regarding Cydonia and Hoagland's made up numbers. It cited first off, Hoagland's disgraceful Explorer 1 mathematics. Explorer 1 was the main thrust of my attack on Hoagland's inability to do mathematics. Yet here we have a person using it as defence. Bad show Alan Fanboi. I knew you didn't do the work, and, probably didn't even read the links. Now that's a cult for you. No, I didn't misspell anything.

What's that coming over the hill? - Hooray, here comes Tony the Bigot to shove his tuppence in.
Tony takes umbrage that Lady Woo posted something praising the Chinese. In fact, when Tony the Bigot is taken to task for referring to the Chinese people as "animals" he ripostes by actually affirming that he did indeed intend to call them animals. But this time, attempts to temper his bigotry by replacing "Chinese" with "Red Chinese."

Good ole boy then compounds his lunacy by declaring that the Explorer 1 mistake was inconsequential and didn't matter. Fucking jeebuz. What a journey this was. I think I need a shower.

Update: I got banned. All posts removed. The usual behaviour of Hoagland's Stasi.

Tuesday, 22 December 2015

Sci-Fi movies as evidence my arse Hoagland.

I came across a blog post by Dr Joseph Farrell. An ex-friend of Hoagland. Farrell booted Hoagland's arse out of his circle of friends after the Hoaxmeister conned Farrell into appearing on a Camelot video round-table discussion about comet Elenin. Farrell, of course, excused himself early on as Hoagland immediately began his preen-fest of bullshit. I shall post a portion of it below. I wonder who the "diva" personality, or what absolute fucktard looks upon sci-fi novels as insider info. Pretty obvious really. This is Farrell having a real go at Hoagland and I am guessing Wilcock amongst others here.

The last year saw the alternative research community - what Mr. Henry calls the "truth community" - taking high dives off the cliffs into belly-flopping hysteria. We were treated to endless hype and the so-called testimony of "whistleblowers" - who must always remain anonymous of course, with little by way of corroboration from other sources to back any of it up.

But we have to ask ourselves why this is happening? Why the tailspin into endless speculations and apocalyptic scenarios, including replays of Hale-Bopp with Elenin, the reliance upon science fiction novels as "analysis", the heavy dose of alleged "whistleblower" testimony, the construction of macro-scenarios of apocalyptic "grandeur"(or perhaps better put of apocalyptic grandiosity)?

In his questioning of Mr. Maugans, William Henry elicited the response that Mr Maugans was connecting dots that would indicate that some of this, at least, is deliberate, suggesting that the aim is really to cast a pall of suspicion over anyone researching in the field. This, is, indeed, what has happened. 2011 saw a move within this "community';(and I hesitate even using that word in connection with alternative research) away from research and analysis, and toward rampant speculation and scenario construction, "whistleblower" testimony, and...well... what I like to call the "diva" personality, i.e., the reliance upon a kind of "capital" built up over the years to promote speculation whose acceptance is based upon the stature or standing individuals have or had within the "community."

Speculation is, of course, the name of the game within this whole field, nothing would get done without it. But there is a great deal of difference between speculation based on research, documents, reasoned argument, and so on, and that based upon a diva's reputation and hysterics and histrionics, whistleblowers, alleged threats, marketing schemes in conjunction with said threats, anecdotes, and so on.

The bottom line, for me, is this, and I have said it often before: "research" based upon whistleblowers, channeling, science fiction novels or Hollywood movies, dubious "word analysis", and all the other claptrap that one so often hears, is not research. One cannot footnote a whistleblower, a channeled source, and so on. These things may, from time to time, shed interesting light on an argument, or even connect an interesting dot or two, but in the final analysis, there is no substitute for real documentable sources, for reasoned speculation and argument. Let's hope that 2012 brings some sanity back to the field.

Wednesday, 9 December 2015

Hoagland, facebook suckers, and downright stupidity.

I find it frustrating and sad that some people can be so sucked in by Richard C. Hoagland's utter batshit crazy ideas, plain bad science, and atrocious mathematical errors yet will still fawn at his altar. Honestly, it's like Hoagland is running some kind of cult. Sadly I am not joking. See below for proof.

4 people like this.
Derek James Eunson
Richard C. Hoagland and Mike Bara. Pseudoscientist liars. Anyone remember…
Anthony D'Andrea Remember that name? For some reason Derek continues to pursue his vendetta against Hoagland, to discredit him, to distract from his messages, to do anything to prevent the truth from coming out.

He and other wackos like him need to learn that the cat is already out of the bag. While those not in bed with the cartels sometimes have to speculate about the final configuration of things or resort to guesswork at times, there is certainly enough proof out there to confirm that the government stories are bogus and there is an alternate view in the process of being formulated.

Hoagland may not always be right -- but he's a lot closer to the truth than the government's story -- and certainly a lot closer than paranoid skeptics like Derek ever want us to be.
Derek James Eunson Hoagland may not always be right?
Which one of these was wrong;
Elenin was a spaceship,
Phobos is a spaceship,
Comets Enke, Hale-Bopp, Hartley and 67/P are spaceships,
President Obama is the reincarnation of Horus?
Alan Abramowitz No one is always right.
LikeReply14 hrsEdited
Derek James Eunson Texas sharpshooter fallacy.
LikeReply15 hrs
Alan Abramowitz You repeat the same bulletpoints smile emoticon
LikeReply14 hrs
Alan Abramowitz That blog by binaryspellbook is so weak. I've made better negative analyses.
The ad homenin ending on what he expects was so immature. Yes we know he looks for arcologies but not no one has refuted him on that expectation of his nor conclusions.
LikeReply13 hrsEdited
Anthony D'Andrea Derek doesn't seek truth -- truth scares him. What he seeks is just attention.
LikeReply2 hrs
Derek James Eunson Phobos etc are not space stations. That is all I am saying.
LikeReply50 mins
Derek James Eunson Not a single member of Hoagland's congregation knows how to set up an experiment. Hoagland relies on this when he tries to use a 40-year-old wristwatch to measure torsion fields and convince us he is using the scientific method. Baselines and controls are PARAMOUNT. Hoagland has shown neither. Therefore, his torsion field experiments are worthless pretend-science.
LikeReply21 mins
Anthony D'Andrea Got to admire Derek for being consistent. Consistently ignorant, but consistent. First word in the title of the URL used to try to discredit Hoagland (Does Derek do anything else?) is "Pseudo". Do I even want to click on it?

I know this: NASA, or more specifically JPL, has been giving us bogus science for years. If it wasn't for Dr. Hoagland, we wouldn't be aware of any of it. I'm not qualified any more than Derek to say he's perfect or completely right or wrong -- but I know he's gotten the attention of the public onto some issues that are sorely in need of looking at. I thank him for that. And while I don't blindly accept everything said by ANYONE, when Hoagland speaks, he will have ,my ear, my respect and my appreciation.

LikeReply13 mins
Derek James Eunson Anthony.Two things. As an electronics engineer of 30+ years experience, I do know how to design an experiment. Richard Hoagland is not a Dr. He has no degree of any kind never mind a Ph.D. - In fact he has nothing more than a high school diploma.
LikeReply8 mins

Monday, 7 December 2015

Hoagland - "I am the only one who got it right."

Richard C. Hoagland our favourite polymath grandly announced on his internet radio show, "I was the only one who got it right." As readers of this and Expat's Emoluments of Mars blog will know, this is typical Hoagland bluster. But what was he claiming this time. He has claimed credit in the past for either discovering or designing; water on Mars, the ocean on Europa, water on the Moon, the Pioneer plaque, and of course, hyperdimensional physics.

It was none of the above. Hoagland was referring to the first ever images of Pluto's surface that arrived on Earth. Within ten fucking minutes, Hoagland was seeing arcologies hundreds of miles in scale that were, "obviously artificial." In the preen-fest that is his radio show Hoagland told his guest and audience, "I was the only one who got it right." - Whilst displaying such hubris is Hoagland's default persona. I still had to think of nice things to stop myself from throwing up. Men and women who worked ten or more years on the New Horizons mission simply discarded while Hoagland peacocks in front of them claiming credit for utterly bastardising and diminishing their hard work.

The latest images are quite simply astonishing. I wonder what lies Hoagland will vomit forth. It will, of course, be about arcologies and ancient space alien ancestors. He will see buildings and bridges and all his usual fluff. Keith Laney will no doubt be invited back as a guest. Laney is a likeable old codger. He really is but believes he sees the same shit as Hoagland in images. Below is an image which shows where the water-ice al-Idrisi mountains meet the nitrogen rich-ices of Sputnik Planum.

Image credit: NASA/JPL-JHU/SWRI

I'm waiting for Hoagland to refer to the "al-Idrisi mountains" on Pluto. You see "al-Idrisi" is almost an anagram of "Isis." - That is more than sufficient "data" for Hoagland to begin his monster extrapolations. Oh and there's more.....Enter Wiki.

Abu Abd Allah Muhammad al-Idrisi al-Qurtubi al-Hasani al-Sabti, or simply Al Idrisi /ælɪˈdriːsiː/, was a Muslim geographer, cartographer and Egyptologist.

Isis, Egyptologist.....<insert here "the model">