Hi Mike,
Yes me ole' mucker. You've done it again haven't you, and I bet like me other ole' mucker RCH you will not admit to being wrong and retract. Valve on Mars ?
Now that the whole valve thing that you wet yourself over and ran with has been perfectly explained how will you wriggle out ? - Wait I know, you will say you are correct and NASA are wrong and they are trying to cover things up even when good guys are leaking stuff like crazy. Your standard bullshit Mike, we are all wise to it.
You must be about as humiliated as Hoagland was with his two inch high Martian apartments. You remember I am sure. Oh, and Hoagland never admitted to being wrong about that either. Instead he said, the physics had changed and it would be possible to have wee tiny 2 inch tall Martians. Seriously Hoagland get the fuck out of Dodge. Nano seconds earlier he was telling people that the face on Mars was a structure that was massive - on the scale of a mile or more. Now he wanted us to believe it was built by two inch high Martians.
Bloody clownhats. Such abject idiocy entangled with such contempt for ones readership, coupled with a complete lack of understanding of the most basic physics.
Can you spot the big fat fucking lie in the below statement from yourself ?
"My Ancient Aliens buddy Jason Martell has suggested this could be a Rock Abrasion Tool (RAT) mark left over from Opportunity drilling on the rock. I initially considered this but dismissed it for several reasons, although I should have probably brought it up in my initial post."
Pants in an advanced state of combustion big time Bara. You absolute liar. I'll tell you what happened. You wet your panties and ran with it without checking the facts. Then your mate Martell comes along with a suggestion that you said you had already considered and then dismissed. What a whopper.
Karma won't like that Mike. No she wont at all.
Kindest Regards
*ps* I hope the $247 you made from your last lie-a-thon keeps the repo men from the door.
Does he explain why he dismissed it?
ReplyDeleteHe dismissed the RAT because it would leave an impression in the rock/soil - and the "valve" appeared to be bulging out. Which incidentally fits perfectly with the explanation Mick West proposes.
ReplyDeleteBara simply did his usual and ran with a story without due diligence.