To RCH, Mike,
Hi,
Can either of you two explain to me why you embrace what you term as HD physics when it is abundantly clear that neither of you;
*Have any academic qualifications in any relevant field, or any other for that matter.
*Understand even basic mathematics as has been demonstrated many times by myself and others.
*Have had any peer reviewed paper published on the subject.
*Have released any paper, either by bloggery or other showing any equations describing what you claim HD physics is capable of.
How can you claim a theory to be true, and to cite Maxwell and quaternion notation when neither of you have a snowballs chance in hell of understanding what a quaternion is or how to handle one.
Jeezus H Christ Hoagland can't even apply the rocket equation without making a fanny of himself, and Bara thinks centrifugal force makes us heavier.
Sharp practice indeed. Possibly quite lucrative if you have the morals of a sewer rat.
Kindest Regards
DJE
After one of his internet woo-woo radio shows, Mike was asked which of Maxwell's 20 quaternions he has used in his hyperdimensional calculations. He responded "All of them."
ReplyDeleteLIAR.
They both cite Nassim Haramein as reliable.
Delete