Hey there Georgie boy

Dr Robbins must be given an avenue of reply after Mike Bara's insult live on air.

Hi George,

Thanks for replying regarding my query about Dr Robbins being allowed to debate Mike Bara on Coast to Coast AM.

I must admit I was very surprised that Bara agreed on air to debate since he usually substitutes gross personal insults as debate.

I had my doubts that Bara would actually do it. I was correct. He was a no show. However I must stress in the strongest possible terms that when a guest on your show insults someone's professional competence. The person whose character has been besmirched should absolutely be afforded a right of reply.

I know that Bara will back out of a debate that he cannot hope to win. But Dr Robbins must be allowed a chance at rebuttal. A one way insult conduit has no place in any media. None whatsoever.

Please allow Dr Robbins a chance to reply to your audience and put forth his defence. Remember George, you were clearly shocked when Bara said, "yeah he's a scientist, but, frankly he sucks at it."

This injustice needs to be addressed sir. Or at the very least Bara be removed from the C2C guest list until he either debates, retracts, or Dr Robbins gets a right of reply. You DO live in America don't you ?

Kindest Regards
Derek James Eunson

The Arsehole Brothers Ride Again.

Do not approach. Do not listen. These men are extremely dangerous to your IQ.

Mike Bara's preferred debating method.

Honestly. What a nasty piece of work this fat bastard really is. Below are some choice quotes from the Fatmeister himself when "debating" the ridiculous assertion that there is a robot head on the Moon.


Mike Bara.

No, I rely on my critics having below baboon IQ's, which you obviously do. I'm surpised they even let you have access to a computer in a Turkish prison.



Tara, talk to me when you can prove you're not so ugly that guys turn to stone when they look at your face. Start by not hiding behind a phony profile picture.



I have never questioned your gender identity, although that highly defensive response and your profile picture indicate that I should. Why would I "debate" you when all you offer are personal attacks and non-sequiters? You are simply another example of someone who cannot argue the facts and must therefore make it personal. I'm sorry if your daddy didn't love you and you and you hate all men that are smarter than you. But please see a therapist instead of wasting my time with non-arguments.


Thank you for proving what you don't know. Please explain how a "chromatic aberration" can appear on 2 sets of NASA data taken under the same lighting conditions from 2 different angles? I'll answer it for you; they can't. The only way that can happen is if the red stripe is--- wait for it--- ACTUALLY THERE ON THE OBJECT! Dumbass


BBE, the whole point is to show inbred morons like you that you don't even need to use Photoshop to find the red stripe that Expat says doesn't exist. Turns out that like on pretty much everything else, he has his head up his ass.

Mike Bara - Engineer or fucking pansy ?

I am not expecting Bara to reply.

Hi Mike,

So George tells me that it takes two to tango.
From this I take it that you refuse to debate Dr Robbins even after agreeing to do so.

I can't say I am surprised. Even although you have stated in the past that Stephen Hawking's mind is as diseased as his body, and that you are confident you can prove there are no such things as the laws of physics. No I am not surprised at all.

So you tuck tail and run like a wee pansy yet again. Same as Hoagland. When presented with real scientists you simply cannot cope. Your utter woo is exposed, your mathematics taken apart and laughed at and your reputation rightfully besmirched.

Man up Mikey. Go debate.

Kindest Regards
DJE

George Noory's one liner

I wrote to George Noory......again.

Asking when Dr Stuart Robbins was going to get to debate Mike Bara as promised.

Hi,

Any idea when Dr Robbins will be afforded the promised debate on C2C AM.

I have waited many months after George promised and nada.

What's going on. Will Mike Bara debate Dr Robbins or not ?

Kindest Regards
Derek James Eunson.


george@coasttocoastam.com

12:19 AM (8 hours ago)

to me

That’s the issue need two to tango



So there we have it. As suspected Bara is all mouth. He won't debate
even though he agreed to.

Will The Morningstar Rise and Reply

Hi Robert,

I listened to your Far Out Radio broadcast and looked at the images you provided.
Almost everything you said is wrong. What's going on man ? - Are you trying to cash in on the Hoagland approach - mistaking pareidolia for spaceship hangars and the like.

You do realise that James Concannon has taken to pieces your presentation in a most convincing fashion.

Is this something you would be willing to address. Even via responding to James' bloggery on the above link. I'm sure the readers would be interested in a debate. Or are you just like the rest of the hucksters, Hoagland, Bara, Wilcock et al ? - Talk shite, grab the cash and run like a little bitch ?

I mean Mike Bara once said that he was completely confident that he could prove there was no such thing as the laws of physics. Can you imagine a former cad-cam jockey with no understanding of basic physics or mathematics saying such a thing.

It was hilarious. I still laugh every time I think of that dunce saying that. On radio too. So Mike cannot default to his usual defence "I never said that." When cornered and caught out making stuff up.

Come on, MAN THE FUCK UP and back up your assertions. Go debate Jimmy Concannon.

Kindest Regards
DJE

Hoagland's Bulova Bollocks

Hi Richard,

It was only a matter of time before someone repeated your accutron experiment.

Unfortunately for you, yet fortunately for the rest of us it was done by a real engineer.

Bad news for HD physics I'm afraid.

It also comes with a YouTube video.

Happy viewing

DJE